Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Orlando Luz vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Luz vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Orlando Luz vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Luz 1 - 0 Ilkel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Luz has won 51.04% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 46.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Luz, in recent form, has won 47.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 52.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.73% and 25.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Luz has saved 63.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 52.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Luz has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 35/ 28), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Luz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 305/ 181), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Luz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.24% of matches (W/L 32/ 27), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Luz winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Luz winning 2 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Luz and Ilkel was at the Forli Challenger, 15-06-2021, First, Clay with Orlando Luz getting the victory 7-5 3-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:27:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Luz and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Luz winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Luz winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Luz has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.9 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 224.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Luz has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Luz has converted 39.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 41.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
352
Rank
272
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
414
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
61% (322-204)
Career Total W/L
56% (401-313)
50% (14-14)
YTD W/L
39% (9-14)
$2,945
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Orlando Luz | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:27:26 | 2:27:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (58/96) | 53% (56/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (41/58) | 66% (37/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (19/38) | 50% (25/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (44/106) | 38% (36/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Orlando Luz
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
106)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Orlando Luz | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (14/14) | 39% (9/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (37/35) | 39% (20/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (370/352) | 45% (208/257) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (14/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 120 | 113 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 84 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:1 | 1:29:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 244.93 | 171.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1366/2371) | 57% (805/1413) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (961/1366) | 70% (566/805) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (513/1005) | 47% (284/608) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (85/216) | 40% (38/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (862/2290) | 36% (479/1345) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (14/14) | 47% (7/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 36% (8/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (3/15) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 47% (7/15) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (15/9) | 70% (10/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (15/6) | 30% (10/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 15% (13/2) |
Orlando Luz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Orlando Luz
54%
(
65 of
120)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
113)
4
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
11
82%
(
53 of
65)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
49%
(
27 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
40 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(5) 7-6(9) 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Orlando Luz
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Orlando Luz
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
13
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
91%
(
40 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Peter Heller
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Orlando Luz
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Orlando Luz
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Petr Brunclik
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Orlando Luz
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
9
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Luz Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
